It’s a holiday week, so I’m re-posting popular blog posts from the past.
This is one of my favorites. It was among my first forays into editorial commentary and defending the EA designation. It’s too long and rambly (a common trait of my writing between 2011 and 2013) but I think I gave a game effort at explaining the psychology of being an EA.
—–
(Originally published March 14, 2012)
I am an EA myself, and I see this same grumpiness. I get the sense that some (NOT all and not even most, but SOME) EAs resent CPAs and attorneys. In particular, there are pockets of the EA world that resent the fact that CPAs are regarded as the premiere “tax people.”
Who “Owns” the Tax World?
Some of the frustration is legitimate. For example, the AICPA saying that CPAs “own the tax preparation business” is utterly ridiculous and offensive to any non-CPA in the tax world. (Question: Did the AICPA really say this? I have seen other folks say the AICPA has said this, but haven’t seen an original source.)
But it’s equally ridiculous for EAs to claim the moral high ground about EA being a “better” tax designation. Designations are just designations. A designation means you passed a test (or several tests). Sure, the educational requirements differ, and we can go round and round and round and round and round and round (that’s 6 “rounds”) arguing about which test is harder. But in the end, it’s all about passing tests. That’s why I don’t worry too much about CPAs and attorneys being exempted from taking the RTRP exam (this seems to be another “crabby point” for some EAs).
EAs Left in the Dust?
EAs also have a very real and legitimate fear that we will get left in the dust once the new RTRP designation gets rolling. After all, RTRPs have the phrase “tax return preparer” in their designation, while EAs are saddled with a designation that includes the word “agent” (automatic code word for “Works for the IRS, flee for your lives!”). EAs need to be educating the public, and we need help from our national association — help that I feel has been absent in the past (though the association says public education is its #1 priority in the new “3-year plan”).
It’s All About Education
Personally, I use the lack of knowledge about EAs as a talking point. I know I have a built-in “conversation piece” whenever I meet someone new. There is a 99.9% chance (almost literally) that they will have no clue what an EA is. I have an opportunity to educate them and set a positive tone. That’s all I can do. Having anger or animosity toward CPAs, or RTRPs, or the world in general, won’t help the public know what an EA is.
JD-
The AICPA did indeed say that CPAs “own” the tax preparation business. From a TWTP post of several years ago –
Fellow tax blogger Marilyn Lawver, who just happens to be a CPA, wrote the following in a blog post (the highlight is mine) –
“Robert {meaning me–RDF} is correct that a CPA is not specifically licensed for tax preparation, rather ‘a CPA is a licensed accountant, authorized to certify audits of financial statements’. Just a couple of months ago, I was pondering this exact issue. I was thinking about all the fancy credentials the AICPA offers for CPAs in other specialties – financial planning, fraud examination, business valuation – and wondering how to become a certified tax expert.
So I emailed the AICPA asking about it. Here’s the exact wording of the response I received:
’We do not offer a credential in taxation. In general, our approach has been not to develop credential programs around areas for which the public already believes CPAs to ‘own’. In addition, we do not endorse a particular tax credential.’”
The AICPA continues to attempt to “thwart” the public knowledge and acceptance of the fact that EAs are proven tax experts and CPAs are not.
RDF
Robert – thanks for providing the documentation on the “CPAs own the tax preparation” part. I knew it was out there somewhere.
[…] Jason Dinesen, From the Archives: Why are Enrolled Agents So Crabby? […]